Private Use Ends Where an Escaped File Would Do Harm
Private Use Ends Where an Escaped File Would Do Harm Which AI generation for one's own use is the maker's to decide, and which rules against it are justified Position note · private generation, copyright, sexual deepfakes, the risk a stored file carries, and the rules that follow Andraž Đurič Version 1 · September 2026 Abstract This note asks which AI-generated media made for the maker's own use, on the maker's own devices, is the maker's to decide. The line it draws is not private versus shared. It is what an output would do to someone else if it left the maker's control. A private feature-length adaptation of a copyrighted comic falls on the permitted side: one copy displaces no identifiable sale and presents nothing to anyone. A sexual image of an identifiable real person, made without consent, is the hard case. Whether making it privately wrongs that person is contested, and the side holding that it does is currentl...