Universal Is Not Categorical
Universal Is Not Categorical An ought that binds every agent without binding independently of any agent Clarification note · metaethics, is–ought, normativity, and persistence Andraž Đurič Version 1 · 28 August 2026 Abstract This corpus holds that every ought carries an agent in its index and that no categorical ought exists. One ought appears to threaten that position by binding every agent without exception: for every agent A, A ought not undergo A’s own residue-free dissolution . It does not threaten it. Universal quantification over agents is not agent-independence. The ought is non-escapable because only a persister can be addressed by an ought at all, so its antecedent is guaranteed by the act of addressing — but the agent remains in the index, and stripping the agent leaves nothing behind. The published falsification condition for the structural claim is untouched. Three separate arguments supp...